NSRP
|
Please be advised that neither the National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP), nor NSRP ASE, nor Advanced Technology Institute (ATI):
The Bulletin Board presented herein is provided solely as a service to the general public and bears no warranty, either express or implied. Use of the Bulletin Board by a USER implies USER's assumption of risk, and NSRP neither accepts nor assumes legal liability for any activities pursued hereunder.
| Click here to post a question |
|
1.
Seeking information on Work Breakdown
Structures as being used in ship repair. posted
7/15/02 by Paul Ziakin Click here to post a response to this question |
|
2.
Seeking information on how other shipyards deal
with debundling structural steel. Specifically, what means of material
handling do shipyards use to get the material on a conveyor system and
position it to go through the blast. Any information would be greatly
appreciated. posted 9/30/02 by
Matthew L. Tompkins Click here to post a response to this question |
|
3.
We are beginning a lean transformation at
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and since we are a public yard, it is hard to
say that lean will get more money for the employees. How do we
present it to the workers such that they can internalize the lean
concepts and begin to look at ways to remove waste from their areas and be
more efficient? How do you prove that Five S actually saved money off the
bottom line? Everyone agrees qualitatively that it's a good thing, but how
do we show the savings, particularly since we are not for profit? posted
1/29/04 by Dana Simon There is a book entitled "Lean Transformation" by Henderson et al. that has a very good discussion of the implementation side. A great read to answer your question. posted 5/27/04 by LCDR Frank S. Mulcahy Click here to post a response to this question |
|
4. We did a pilot project at an
RMC (Repair and Maintenance Center) this summer to explore the
feasibility of Cellular Manufacturing in a shipyard. When it comes to
implementing cells, which are the foundation for any comprehensive Lean
implementation, an RMC, and probably any shipyard for that matter,
will have two constraints: (1) they are organized as
process-specialized shops ex. machine shop, pipe shop, sheetmetal shop,
etc. and (2) they have numeorus monuments that simply could not be
relocated. The result is that traditional cells could not be
implemented in many cases. As a result, there is significant material
flow, people flow, tooling flow, information flow, etc. Today, this
chaos (pardon me!) is addressed via daily production meetings with the
RO followed by each shop's rep then having a meeting with his/her shop
personnel, inter-shop communicatoins (phone calls, emails, walkarounds,
face-to-face, etc.), expediting and, of course, cussing. However,
there is no reason why we could not try to implement VIRTUAL CELLS, and
rely on shopfloor control software and IT enablers to manage these
groups of resources. In our pilot project at this RMC, we used a
representative sample of CASREPS (Casualty Reports), determined a
routing for each CASREP (this is the set of Lead Workcenters and Assist
Workcenters that need to work on the "job") and processed this data
using PFAST. PFAST is a software for Group Technology, Cell Design and
Facility Layout. The analysis suggested that Virtual Cells do exist
even in a repair environment! We would like to validate this concept
further by working with other RMC's and shipyards. Our methodology,
JOBSHOPLEAN, could be deployed in any of your component-producing shops
or it could be used to analyse overall shipyard flows. If you are
interested in having us replicate this project in your facility, please
contact me. Thank you. Posted 9/13/2006 by
Shahrukh A. Irani
|
Notices which organizations and individuals (hereafter termed 'originator') wish to post herein should contain the following:
We reserve the right to refuse to post notices which contain obscene or otherwise inappropriate language. |